Humata
ProductivitySearch, summarize and compare uploaded documents with source-linked answers. Humata adds team-oriented document access and page-based plans for ongoing knowledge work.
Questions across filesCited passages
RESEARCH / FOLLOW THE SOURCES
Metaso
A Chinese AI search and research workspace that organizes answers around sources, with multiple search scopes and daily free credits subject to current service rules.
Metaso official search homepage captured October 3, 2026Explore the image ↓
What you can do with it
What this tool is for
Metaso is a Chinese AI search product for finding and organizing information around a question. Its public interface offers general web and specialist scopes, alongside concise, deeper and research-oriented response modes. It is useful when the task requires sources and synthesis rather than only a fluent standalone answer.
The value of a research assistant depends on the evidence it finds and how accurately it represents it. Treat a generated answer as a map of useful material: inspect the original pages, check dates and distinguish direct evidence from interpretation. A citation next to a sentence is a starting point for review, not proof that the source supports every word.
01
Track a changing topic
02
Prepare an academic reading list
03
Compare product evidence
04
Create a briefing for a team
A closer look at the product
Official product image. Click to inspect the details.
Product interface and examples
Key features, practical tasks
Capabilities in practice
- Question-led web research: Write a natural-language question with context, location and time range. The answer can help organize the topic, but narrow ambiguous terms before using it to support a decision.
- Specialist search scopes: The public interface includes scopes such as academic material, documents, images, video and podcasts. Choose a scope that matches the evidence required; search visibility does not guarantee full-text access.
- Different depth modes: Concise, deeper and deep-research entries support different levels of investigation. Start with a small question and check the current credit conditions before choosing a more involved task.
- Source-oriented review: Use linked material to trace important claims back to their origin. Look for primary announcements or original studies and avoid counting several copies of the same report as independent confirmation.
- Source preferences: Official source-preference controls allow preferred or excluded domains. These can make a search more relevant, but they also shape the evidence you see and should not be mistaken for a truth filter.
- File-based work: The interface provides a file-upload entry for supported material. Ask questions about a defined document and compare extracted details with the original, especially for tables and scanned pages.
- Connected creation entries: The product also displays learning, slides and video-related paths. These are separate tasks with their own availability or cost conditions; do not assume every creative feature is covered by free search credits.
Get started, step by step
- 01
Define the question
- 02
Choose scope and depth
- 03
Review the evidence
- 04
Build a reusable result
A practical first workflow
A practical first workflow
- Define the question. State the topic, intended use, date range and geographic scope. A precise question reduces irrelevant material and makes omissions easier to spot.
- Choose scope and depth. Select the search range and response mode suited to the task. Review the credit balance and any displayed cost before starting a long research or media operation.
- Review the evidence. Open the strongest sources and check what they actually say. Note whether a claim is current, first-hand and supported by the cited passage.
- Build a reusable result. Save a concise evidence table or brief with links, dates and unresolved questions. Revise the answer when a source conflicts with it rather than smoothing away the disagreement.
Example prompt or task: Research this topic using sources published in the last six months. Make a table of claim, original source, publication date and uncertainty. Separate direct evidence from commentary and leave unsupported claims unconfirmed.
This editorial prompt is intended to make review easier. It does not guarantee complete retrieval or accurate citation placement.
Find the right plan for you
Free daily credits
Explore official plans ↗Free plan Unused daily credits do not carry forward
The service terms describe daily free credits; API and media services have separate terms.
What is free and what can cost extra
The official service terms describe free credits refreshed each day for ordinary users. Daily credits are valid for that day, unused amounts do not roll over, and the next day starts a new daily allowance. The exact allowance and applicable service scope can change under the published rules.
The terms distinguish daily free credits from longer-term credits obtained through other mechanisms, including purchases. Optional paid services, media generation and API access must be checked on their own pages. Do not infer that a visible free search entry includes unlimited research, every model or free developer usage.
A few things worth knowing
Frequently asked questions
Is Metaso free?
There is an ongoing daily-credit route described in its terms, alongside paid options. Check the current amount and eligible functions.
Do unused daily credits accumulate?
The terms say daily free credits are valid that day and do not carry forward. Other credit pools can have different rules.
Does deep research always cost the same?
Do not assume a fixed cost. Check the selected mode and current account interface before starting.
Are all citations reliable?
No automatic guarantee follows from displaying a link. Open the source and check that it supports the associated claim.
Can I prefer specific websites?
The official source-preference page provides controls for preferred or excluded sources. Remember that these settings affect the evidence retrieved.
Does academic search unlock every paper?
No. Search results do not imply full-text rights or access to every publisher.
Are video generation and APIs free too?
This profile does not establish that. Their pricing and limits should be reviewed separately.
The details behind your decision
Explore platforms, inputs and outputs, licensing, and access requirements.
Four useful starting projects
Four useful starting projects
- Track a changing topic: Ask for developments during a specific period and request publication dates beside each source. Separate updates from older background pages that have only recently been indexed.
- Prepare an academic reading list: Use the academic scope to identify relevant work and inspect the actual papers or abstracts. Check methods and publication status instead of relying on a generated ranking.
- Compare product evidence: Define the exact capabilities to compare and favor official documentation. Mark missing information explicitly, and keep marketing claims separate from independently measured results.
- Create a briefing for a team: Turn a researched question into a short brief with confirmed facts, competing explanations and open issues. Preserve source links so colleagues can review the same material.
Platforms, inputs, outputs and setup
Platforms, inputs, outputs and setup
Metaso runs as a hosted web service, with an official browser-search setup guide for users who want a convenient search entry. Using it as a browser search provider does not turn it into a local inference engine; submitted questions still use the hosted service.
Search answers may draw on public third-party pages and user-provided material. Some sources are inaccessible, outdated or incomplete, and a document result may expose only an abstract or preview. Keep those limitations visible in your final brief instead of implying you reviewed material you could not open.
Data, permissions and licensing
Data, permissions and licensing
Questions and uploads are processed under the service terms and applicable data policies. Use material you are permitted to submit, and avoid including personal information that is not needed to answer the research question.
Metaso publishes an AI-generated content notice. Preserve appropriate context when sharing generated summaries or images, and distinguish your own review from the original source material. A useful research record includes both the answer and the evidence used to evaluate it.
Sources, documentation and help
Official sources and review date
Official sources and review date
Reviewed October 3, 2026. Product facts come from the official sources below. Suggested projects, prompts and review methods are FindGoodAI editorial guidance, not measured performance results.
Your experience can help someone choose
COMMUNITY
Sign in to rate and comment
Tried it? Share your experience
Loading experiences…
Manage my comments
Community and moderation
Saved tools are private. Approved comments are public; edits return to moderation. Comment counts include approved comments and replies. Each person has one rating. New ratings are automatically approved; withdrawn, unapproved or invalid ratings do not count. Share real experiences and avoid spam, private information or personal attacks.
For moderation appeals or data requests: support@findgoodai.com
NEXT STEP
Explore Metaso ↗Ask a research question with a clear time range
Bring a real task and see how it fits the way you work.
Jump to a section
User experiences